Virtual PLCs and Safety PLCs — A New Era of Control Systems

Modern manufacturing is increasingly driven by flexibility, speed, and safety. In this context, two types of control technologies have gained widespread attention: virtual PLCs and safety PLCs. While they serve different purposes, both contribute significantly to the performance and resilience of industrial automation systems.

Title

  1. What Is a Virtual PLC?

A virtual PLC (vPLC) is a software-based version of a traditional programmable logic controller. Instead of being embedded in dedicated hardware, it runs on an industrial PC or server using virtualization technologies.

Virtual PLCs allow manufacturers to scale up control systems quickly, reduce hardware dependency, and integrate more easily with modern IT infrastructure.

  1. What Is a Safety PLC?

A safety PLC is a specialized programmable controller designed to perform safety-related functions in compliance with international safety standards, such as IEC 61508 or ISO 13849.

It is responsible for monitoring emergency stops, safety doors, light curtains, and other critical components, ensuring that machinery can be shut down safely in hazardous situations.

  1. Key Differences Between Virtual PLCs and Safety PLCs

Virtual PLCs are primarily used for general-purpose automation tasks and are valued for their flexibility and integration capabilities. In contrast, safety PLCs are hardware-redundant and certified to perform fail-safe operations in critical environments.

Virtual PLCs cannot currently replace safety PLCs in safety-rated applications due to the lack of certification and hardware-level redundancy.

  1. When to Use Each Type

Use virtual PLCs when scalability, cloud connectivity, and rapid deployment are important. They are ideal for digital factories, distributed systems, and software-defined automation.

Use safety PLCs when human or equipment safety is at risk. They are essential in high-risk machines such as press systems, robotic arms, and conveyor lines.

  1. Combining Virtual and Safety PLCs

Many manufacturers now adopt hybrid architectures that combine both virtual and safety PLCs. The virtual PLC handles production logic and process automation, while the safety PLC monitors hazards and executes emergency protocols.

This approach allows companies to benefit from both flexible software control and guaranteed safety compliance.

Conclusion

Virtual PLCs and safety PLCs are not competitors—they are complementary tools for modern industrial automation. While virtual PLCs provide agility and digital integration, safety PLCs ensure operational security and regulatory compliance.

As Industry 4.0 continues to evolve, combining both technologies will be essential to building scalable, smart, and safe manufacturing environments.